Discussion about this post

User's avatar
JimK's avatar

I appreciate that in their own little way the Braves are resisting the impulse to go along with the crazy salary escalations being perpetrated by the MLBPA and the new breed of hedge-funded mega-owners.

(1) I'm delighted that the Braves -- in deed more than word -- seem eager to stay under a third consecutive penalty cap. High draft choices (along with prudent international signings) are the best way to combat future participation in free agent auctions.

(2) It annoys me when journalists seem eager to promote some remaining high priced free agent as of interest to the Braves. Minimum salary investments like Grant Holmes, home grown prospects like A.J. Smith-Shawver, and still cost-effective former high picks like Ian Anderson can save us many mulitples off the price of free agents.

(3) As for a pricey reliever like soon to be 40-year old David Robertson who wants a raise off his 8-figure paycheck off an impressive age 39 season, would his innings necesarily be ten times better than the job Holmes would do filling in for Jimenez for a year? Or just moving all our relievers up a notch and giving the best of our dozen or so minimum salary fringe or non-roster guys a shot as the 6th-7th inning guy? Maybe not, or maybe Robertson's price comes down when he turns age 40.25 in July.

So I favor keeping the ($10 million or so?) remaining cash under the cap unspent until the deadline. You never know which spot may necessitate an injury replacement now through July 31. We can't be sure who will be out of the running and looking to dump the final payments on one-year deals signed in more optimistic days. Like our Anderson and Holmes yesterday, Michael Soroka of the Nats pitched three no-hit innings today for the Nationals. He's on a $9 million one year deal. If the Nats are out of wild card contention by the deadline ... I'd love to see him back in a Braves uniform.

Expand full comment
Jerry's avatar

👍🏼🍿

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts